Evidence Hub

Association between First Trimester Exposure to Ambient PM2.5 and NO2 and Congenital Heart Defects: A Population-Based Cohort Study of 1,342,198 Live Births in Canada

S. Buteau, Paige Veira, M. Bilodeau-Bertrand, N. Auger

Environmental Health Perspectives, 2023

22 citations

Abstract

Background: The extent to which ambient air pollution contributes to the pathogenesis of congenital heart defects remains uncertain. Objective: We investigated whether first trimester exposure to ambient fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) was associated with the risk of critical and noncritical heart defects in a large population-based cohort of births. Methods: We carried out a retrospective cohort study of children conceived between 2000 and 2016 in Quebec, Canada. Heart defects were identified via data from the Maintenance and Use of Data for the Study of Hospital Clientele registry. The main exposures were average concentration of PM2.5 and NO2 in a) the first trimester and b) the month of conception. Exposures were estimated at the residential postal code. Associations with critical and noncritical heart defects were assessed using logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal and infant characteristics. We considered single- and two-pollutant models and assessed modifying effects of maternal comorbidity, including preexisting hypertension, preeclampsia, anemia, and diabetes. Results: The cohort comprised 1,342,198 newborns, including 12,715 with heart defects. Exposure in the first trimester and month of conception yielded similar results; both were associated with a greater risk of heart defects. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for any heart defect per interquartile range increase were 1.02 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.05) for PM2.5 and 1.10 (95% CI: 1.07,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free