Evidence Hub

Effects of Sociodemographic Characteristics, Comorbidity, and Coexposures on the Association between Air Pollution and Type 2 Diabetes: A Nationwide Cohort Study

M. Sørensen, A. Poulsen, U. Hvidtfeldt, J. Christensen, J. Brandt, L. Frohn, M. Ketzel, Christopher Andersen et al.

Environmental Health Perspectives, 2023

17 citations

Abstract

Background: Exposure to air pollution has been associated with a higher risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D), but studies investigating whether deprived groups are more susceptible to the harmful effects of air pollution are inconsistent. Objectives: We aimed to investigate whether the association between air pollution and T2D differed according to sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidity, and coexposures. Methods: We estimated residential exposure to PM2.5, ultrafine particles (UFP), elemental carbon, and NO2 for all persons living in Denmark in the period 2005–2017. In total, 1.8 million persons 50–80 y of age were included for main analyses of whom 113,985 developed T2D during follow-up. We conducted additional analyses on 1.3 million persons age 35–50 y. Using Cox proportional hazards model (relative risk) and Aalens additive hazard model (absolute risk), we calculated associations between 5-y time-weighted running means of air pollution and T2D in strata of sociodemographic variables, comorbidity, population density, road traffic noise, and green space proximity. Results: Air pollution was associated with T2D, especially among people age 50–80 y, with hazard ratios of 1.17 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.13, 1.21] per 5 μg/m3 PM2.5 and 1.16 (95% CI: 1.13, 1.19) per 10,000 UFP/cm3. In the age 50–80 y population, we found higher associations between air pollution and T2D among men in comparison with women, people with lower education vs. individuals with high education,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free