Evidence Hub

Early Life Environmental Exposure to Cadmium, Lead, and Arsenic and Age at Menarche: A Longitudinal Mother–Child Cohort Study in Bangladesh

Annachiara Malin Igra, Anisur Rahman, Anna L. V. Johansson, J. Pervin, Pernilla Svefors, S. El Arifeen, M. Vahter, L. Persson et al.

Environmental Health Perspectives, 2023

935 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

Background: Several metals act as endocrine disruptors, but there are few large longitudinal studies about associations with puberty onset. Objectives: We evaluated whether early life cadmium, lead, and arsenic exposure was associated with timing of menarche. Methods: In a mother–child cohort in rural Bangladesh (n=935), the exposure was assessed by concentrations in maternal erythrocytes in early pregnancy and in girls’ urine at 5 and 10 years of age using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The girls were interviewed twice, at average ages 13.3 [standard deviation (SD)=0.43] and 13.8 (SD=0.43) y, and the date of menarche, if present, was recorded. Associations were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and multivariable-adjusted Cox regression. Results: In total, 77% of the girls (n=717) had reached menarche by the second follow-up. The median age of menarche among all girls was 13.0 y (25th–75th percentiles: 12.4–13.7 y). At 10 years of age, median urinary cadmium was 0.25μg/L (5th–95th percentiles: 0.087–0.72μg/L), lead 1.6μg/L (0.70–4.2μg/L), and arsenic 54μg/L (19–395μg/L). Given the same age, girls in the highest quartile of urinary cadmium at 5 and 10 years of age had a lower rate of menarche than girls in the lowest quartile, with an adjusted hazard ratio of (HR) 0.80 (95% CI: 0.62, 1.01) at 5 years of age, and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.60, 0.98) at 10 years of age. This implies that girls in the highest cadmium exposure quartile during childhood had a higher age at…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 935 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free