Evidence Hub

Vitamin D Supplementation on Metabolic and Endocrine Profiles in Women with polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Regression of Randomized Controlled Trials

Pan D, Rui Z, Zhang W, Xia Y, Gao L, Yang L, Xia H, Liao W et al.

2026

882 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Polyendocrine metabolic ovarian syndrome (PMOS) is a heterogeneous endocrine-metabolic disorder characterized by insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, hyperandrogenism, and chronic low-grade inflammation. Despite a high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency in affected women, the metabolic and endocrine benefits of supplementation remain inconclusive. Objective To evaluate the effects of vitamin D supplementation on glucose metabolism, lipid profiles, androgen-related outcomes, and inflammatory markers in women with PMOS, and to explore sources of heterogeneity and the synergistic effect of concomitant metformin therapy. Methods This PROSPERO-registered meta-analysis (CRD420261289375) followed PRISMA guidelines. Five databases were searched through August 2025 for eligible RCTs. Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals were pooled using random- or fixed-effects models. Subgroup analyses, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness and explore effect modifiers. Results Fourteen RCTs (882 participants) were included. Vitamin D supplementation significantly improved HOMA-IR, QUICKI, FPG, fasting insulin, HOMA-β, total cholesterol, LDL-C, VLDL-C, total testosterone, and mF-G score. No significant effects were observed for triglycerides, HDL-C, hs-CRP, SHBG, FAI, BMI, or body weight. Combination therapy with metformin produced greater improvements in insulin resistance than vitamin D monotherapy. Conclusion Vitamin D…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 882 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free