Evidence Hub

Association between Kawasaki Disease and Prenatal Exposure to Ambient and Industrial Air Pollution: A Population-Based Cohort Study

S. Buteau, S. Belkaibech, M. Bilodeau-Bertrand, M. Hatzopoulou, A. Smargiassi, N. Auger

Environmental Health Perspectives, 2020

505,336 participants · 18 citations

Abstract

Background: Environmental factors may contribute to the development of Kawasaki disease in children, but prenatal environmental exposures are understudied. Objective: We used a population-based cohort to investigate whether prenatal exposure to outdoor air pollution is associated with the incidence of Kawasaki disease in childhood. Methods: We performed a longitudinal cohort study of all children born in Quebec, Canada, between 2006 and 2012. Children were followed for Kawasaki disease from birth until 31 March 2018. We assigned prenatal air pollutant exposure according to the residential postal code at birth. The main exposure was annual average concentration of ambient fine particulate matter [PM ≤2.5μm in aerodynamic diameter (PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2) from satellite-based estimates and land-use regression models. As secondary exposures, we considered industrial PM2.5, NO2, and sulfur dioxide (SO2) emissions estimated from dispersion models. We estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for maternal age, parity, sex, multiple birth, maternal smoking during pregnancy, socioeconomic status, birth year, and rural residence. We considered single and multipollutant models. We performed several sensitivity analyses, including assessing modifying effects of maternal comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, preeclampsia). Results: The cohort comprised 505,336 children, including 539 with Kawasaki disease. HRs for each interquartile range increase…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 505,336 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free