Correction to: Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study
Abstract
This is a correction to: Dagrun Slettebø Daltveit, Kari Klungsøyr, Anders Engeland, Anders Ekbom, Mika Gissler, Ingrid Glimelius, Tom Grotmol, Laura MadanatHarjuoja, Anne Gulbech Ording, Henrik Toft Sørensen, Rebecca Troisi, Tone Bjørge, Sex differences in childhood cancer risk among children with major birth defects: a Nordic population-based nested case-control study, International Journal of Epidemiology, dyac192, https:// doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyac192
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a case-control, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.
Read the paper
Related studies
- In silico strategies for modeling RNA aptamers and predicting binding sites of their molecular targets
- Folic acid-hydrophilic polymer coated mesoporous silica nanoparticles target doxorubicin delivery
- Anti-phytopathogenic and plant growth promoting potential of endophytic fungi isolated from Dysoxylum gotadhora
- Mercury toxicity causes iron and sulfur deficiencies along with oxidative injuries in alfalfa (Medicago sativa)
- Suppression of lncRNA GAS6-AS2 alleviates sepsis-related acute kidney injury through regulating the miR-136-5p/OXSR1 axis in vitro and in vivo
- Assessing the Protective Effect of Moringa oleifera Extract against Bone Metastasis: An In Vitro Simulated Digestion Approach
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.