Evidence Hub

Correction to: Potential Influence of Menstrual Status and Sex Hormones on Female Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Cross-sectional Multicenter Study in Wuhan, China

Anonymous

Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2022

1 citation

Abstract

Clinical Infectious Diseases 2023;76(2):373 © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions @oup.com https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciac576 An error appeared in the 1 May 2021 issue of the journal (Ding et al. “Potential Influence of Menstrual Status and Sex Hormones on Female Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Infection: A Cross-sectional Multicenter Study in Wuhan, China.” Clin Infect Dis; 79[9]: e240–e248. https:// doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa1022). There is currently one footnote that reads “T. D., J. Z., T. W., P. C., Z. C., X. M. and S. W. contributed equally to this work.” This footnote should be split into two to better reflect the contributions of the authors to this study: a T. D., J. Z., T. W., P. C., and Z. C. contributed equally to this work. b X. M. and S. W. contributed equally to this work. The authors regret the error.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free