Evidence Hub

Metal-ceramic prosthesis pitfalls: a clinical cross-sectional study at a tertiary care hospital in pakistan

Zaibun Nisa Javed, Ali Waqar Qureshi, Adnan Sunny, Asma Ejaz Khan, Shujaat Hasan Idris, Sardar Waleed Babar

Pakistan journal of physiology, 2025

150 participants

Abstract

Background: Tooth-supported Metal Ceramic Fixed Dental Prosthesis (MCFPDs) offers strength, aesthetics, and affordability, but often face minor complications. This study documents common complications of MCFPDs at a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. Methods: This 12-month cross-sectional study included 150 patients with MCFDP complications. Data were collected through patient examination and records, and analyzed on SPSS-23 with Chi-square test, considering p?0.05 as significant. Results: A total of 150 patients (63 males, 87 females) with a mean age of 38±8 years (Range: 20–60 years) were examined for complications in tooth-supported fixed-fixed metal-ceramic prostheses. Most belonged to high (52.7%) and mid (46%) socioeconomic status (SES); 1.3% were low-income. Education levels included primary (34.7%), secondary (40%), and higher (25.3%). Among 566 MCFDP units (323 retainers, 243 pontics), complications were more frequent in the maxillary arch (56%) and in anterior (32.7%) right posterior (32.7%) and left posterior regions (30.0%). Biological failures (78.7%), mainly secondary caries (35.3%) dominated. Failures occurred mostly in general practice (96.7%), and after 12 years (22%). Conclusion: The most prevalent fixed dental prosthesis (FDP) complication was secondary caries, followed by periodontal compromises. Dental practitioners must ensure effective case selection, diagnosis, and treatment plan.

Pak J Physiol 2025;21(3):34–6, DOI:…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 150 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free