Evidence Hub

P0493 Patient satisfaction with IBD undergoing colonoscopy: a multicenter cross-sectional study

D. Napolitano, A. L. Cascio, M. Bozzetti, A. Povoli, S. Grubissa, L. Molino, M. Marino, D. Berretti et al.

Journal of Crohn's & Colitis, 2025

444 participants

Abstract

Colonoscopy is essential in managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), facilitating disease activity assessment, mucosal healing monitoring, and colorectal cancer prevention. However, its invasive nature and associated discomfort often compromise patient satisfaction. This study evaluated patient satisfaction with colonoscopy and its determinants, including perceived stress, disease activity, procedural characteristics, and physician expertise.

This multicentric cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2023 and September 2024 at three endoscopy centres: Fondazione Policlinico Gemelli IRCCS, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale and La Maddalena Cancer Center. Patients with IBD were consecutively recruited during routine colonoscopy appointments. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Endoscopy Customer Satisfaction Questionnaire (ECSQ), and perceived stress was measured using the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-10). Additional demographic and clinical data, including age, gender, prior colonoscopy experience, and disease activity, were collected via pre- and post-procedure questionnaires. Statistical analyses included linear regression to identify satisfaction determinants and Kruskal-Wallis tests to evaluate differences among patient subgroups.

A total of 444 IBD patients were included (54% male; median age 45 years, interquartile range 38–53). Most patients (60%) had prior colonoscopy experience, and 70% were in clinical remission during the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 444 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free