Evidence Hub

The Perception of Smile Arc and Buccal Corridor in Medical and Dental Undergraduate Students of Peshawar, Pakistan: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study

Sana Naz, Shahab Adil, Zafar Ul Islam, H. Raza, Summiya Khan, Wajiha Ahmad

Life Science, 2025

196 participants

Abstract

Objective: To compare smile aesthetics perceptions, focusing on components such as smile arc and buccalcorridor, between pre-clinical medical and dental students.Study Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study.Place and Duration of Study: The study was conducted at the Department of Medical and Dental Education forundergraduate students of Peshawar Medical and Dental College, Peshawar, Pakistan from June 2023 toJanuary 2024.Methods: Using Cochran's formula, a descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted on 196 participantsusing a non-probability consecutive sampling technique. Undergraduate medical and dental students aged 21to 28 from specific colleges in Pakistan were included. Participants evaluated digitally altered images of afemale undergraduate student's smile using a 7-point Likert scale. An independent t-test was applied tocompare perceptions among the two groups.Results: Among 196 participants, 143 (72.96%) were female, and 53 (27.04%) were male, with a mean age of25.0±1.96 years. Dental students were exclusively comprised of females, while medical students had a highermale proportion (54.08%). A comparison of buccal corridor perception between pre-clinical medical and dentalstudents showed that dental students generally rated wider corridors less favorably. Significant differenceswere observed at 5 mm and 15 mm corridors (P=0.017 and P=0.044, respectively). A significant difference wasobserved for the widest corridor (25 mm) (P=0.001). A comparison of smile…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 196 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free