Evidence Hub

Inter-organ communication shapes human metabolic tissue states and resolves anti-diabetic drug response modes in a six-tissue microphysiological system

McGilvrey M, Chew S, Siddiqui MF, Bronson R, Uslu M, Ye S, Ospina O, McPherson A et al.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2026

Abstract

Systemic glucose regulation depends on coordinated signaling among metabolically specialized tissues, yet most human in vitro models capture only limited portions of this network. Here, we developed and benchmarked a perfused human six-tissue MPS by combining AnthroHive, a recirculating perfusion platform, with MOTIVE-6, a six-compartment Multiorgan Tissue Interaction Vessel, to culture human gut epithelium, pancreatic islets, liver organoids, adipocytes, skeletal muscle, and midbrain-patterned brain organoids in a microphysiological system. Shared perfusion redirected engineered tissue states toward tissue-aligned metabolic, endocrine, absorptive, contractile, and neural-associated programs while reducing selected isolation-associated stress and remodeling signatures. Under High nutrient conditions, however, multi-tissue interaction shifted liver and islet responses toward inflammatory and nutrient-stress-associated gene expression, indicating context-dependent effects of cross-compartment signaling. Graded nutrient exposure resolved a staged circuit trajectory: Low nutrient conditions supported maintenance-associated programs, Mid nutrient exposure induced compensatory endocrine and anabolic remodeling with declining net glucose depletion, and High nutrient exposure shifted the system toward stress-associated metabolic dysfunction. Under High conditions, metformin and semaglutide produced distinct response modes. Metformin preserved circuit-level glucose handling without…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a preprint, done in cell cultures (in vitro), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free