Evidence Hub

Evaluating Metformin Efficacy in ALS Using Real-World Data: A Causal Inference Approach

Geller JA, Berger A, Locatelli M, Ajroud-Driss S, Al-Lahham T, Arcila-Londono X, Cerri F, Drory V et al.

2026

2,111 participants

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Observational data can provide evidence of treatment effects in a low-burden, cost-effective manner. Using a causal inference framework to address selection bias, we illustrate the approach in ALS by examining previously researched associations, baseline function and sex, and evaluating metformin’s survival benefits.

Methods: Data are from the ALS Natural History Study collected in the United States, Israel, and Italy from 2015 to 2025. We employ propensity score matching, two approaches to address loss to follow-up (i.e. a naive exclusion and principal stratification), and randomization-based inference to evaluate difference in 18-month restricted mean survival time.

Results: For the function investigation, estimated survival is 16.39, 16.14, 16.09, and 16.24 months for the high ALSFRS-R group and 14.04, 14.42, 14.72, and 14.60 months for the low ALSFRS-R group using the non imputed and imputed datasets 1-3, respectively (p<0.0001, N=450; p<0.00001, N=1,485; p<0.00001, N=1,492; p<0.00001, N=1,600). Using principal stratification, estimated survival is 16.38, 16.14, 16.09, and 16.23 months for the high ALSFRS-R group and 14.04, 14.42, 14.72, and 14.59 months for the low ALSFRS-R group with the non imputed and imputed datasets 1-3, respectively (p<0.0001, N=449; p<0.00001, N=1,483; p< 0.00001, N=1,491; p<0.00001, N=1,596). For the sex investigation, estimated survival is 15.20, 15.16, 15.20, and 15.17 months for females and 15.41, 14.84, 14.91, and…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free