Evidence Hub

Clinical Characteristics of Non-Smoking Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Patients: Findings from the KOCOSS Cohort

Joon Young Choi, J. W. Kim, Y. Kim, K. Yoo, K. Jung, J. H. Lee, S. Um, W. Lee et al.

COPD, 2022

2,477 participants · 15 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been regarded as a disease of smokers, but the prevalence of non-smoking COPD patients have been reported to be considerable. We investigated differences in clinical characteristics between smoking and non-smoking COPD patients. We used data from the Korea COPD Subgroup Study (KOCOSS) database, which is a multicenter cohort that recruits patients from 54 medical centres in Korea. Comprehensive comparisons of smoking and non-smoking COPD patients were performed based on general characteristics, exacerbations, symptom scores, radiological findings, and lung-function tests. Of the 2477 patients included in the study, 8.1% were non-smokers and 91.9% were smokers. Non-smoking COPD patients were more likely to be female and to have a higher body mass index and lower level of education. Non-smoking COPD patients had more comorbidities, including hypertension, osteoporosis, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, and experienced more respiratory and allergic diseases. No significant differences in exacerbation rates, symptom scores, or exercise capacity scores were observed between the two groups. Smoking COPD patients had more emphysematous lung according to the radiological findings, and non-smoking patients had more tuberculosis-destroyed lung and bronchiectasis. Lung-function testing revealed no significant difference in the forced expiratory capacity in 1 sec between the two groups, but smokers had more rapid lung-function…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 2,477 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free