Evidence Hub

A double-blind, randomized controlled clinical study: gatifloxacin vs levofloxacin in treatment of 98 patients with urinary tract infections

Huan-Sheng Jin

Chinese Journal of New Drugs and Clinical Remedies, 2004

Abstract

AIM:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of domestic gatifloxacin in the treatment of urinary tract infections. METHODS:A multicenter,double-blind,randomized control clinical trial of gatifloxacin and levofloxacin was conducted. Both two groups were treated with gatifloxacin or levofloxacin 200 mg,iv, gtt,bid,for 7-14 d. RESULTS: The patients enrolled into gatifloxacin group and levofloxacin group in the double-blind study were 48,50 respectively. The patients for the efficacy analysis were 47,50 respectively. The overall cured rate,efficacy rate and bacterial clearance rate in trial group were 89 %,100 %,89 % respectively and those in control group were 90 %,96 %,85 % respectively. The activities of gatifloxacin against gram-positive organisms in vitro were generally higher than those of the other antibacterial agents. The adverse reaction rate was 10 %and 12 % in trial and control group respectively. There were no statistical significant differences in the above results between the two groups(P0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that demostic gatifloxacin is highly effective and safe in the treatment of urinary tract infections.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free