Evidence Hub

1591. Infectious Outcomes of Levofloxacin Prophylaxis in Obese vs. Non-obese Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Amanda L Kurtti, K. Fritz, Kathryn A Elofson, Russell J. Benefield

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2018

98 participants

Abstract

Abstract Background Levofloxacin given at a standard dose of 500 mg daily is recommended for antibacterial prophylaxis in patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Obese patients have been shown to exhibit enhanced clearance of levofloxacin and may be at risk for prophylactic failure. Methods This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluating the infectious outcomes of obese (BMI >30 kg/m2) and non-obese (BMI ≤ 30 kg/m2) adult patients who received standard dose levofloxacin as primary prophylaxis after chemotherapy. Patients were included if they were treated at our institution from June 1, 2014 through May 31, 2017 and had National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) defined intermediate infection risk. Patients were excluded if they were lost to follow-up, treated at another institution for febrile neutropenia (FN), or had renal impairment (estimated creatinine clearance (CrCL) less than 50 mL/minute). The primary endpoint was incidence of FN as defined by NCCN guidelines. Secondary endpoints included 30-day mortality and the correlation between estimated levofloxacin AUC and rates of FN. Levofloxacin AUC was estimated from CrCL using the method of Pai et al. Results A total of 98 patients met the inclusion criteria (34 obese and 64 non-obese). Estimated CrCL was similar between obese and non-obese patients (mean 84.5 vs. 81.6 mL/minute, P = 0.61), as was estimated levofloxacin AUC (mean 115.1 mg hour/L vs. 107.8 mg hour/L, P = 0.25). FN occurred in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 98 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free