Evidence Hub

Fluroquinolone drug resistance among MDR-TB patients increases the risk of unfavorable interim microbiological treatment outcome: An observational study

Nishtha K. Singh, P. Singh, U. Singh, Amita Jain, R. Garg

Journal of Global Antimicrobial Resistance, 2020

64 participants · 19 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sputum culture conversion at the end of intensive phase of multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) treatment is a key predictor for successful treatment outcome. This observational study was undertaken to assess the interim microbiological outcome of a cohort of rifampicin-resistant (RR)-TB patients with variable resistance to second-line drugs.

METHODS

During Jan-Apr 2018, we consecutively enrolled 100 RR-TB cases who underwent phenotypic drug susceptibility testing (DST) to assess the baseline resistance to second-line drugs. Following RR-TB diagnosis, these patients were started on MDR-TB treatment. At 6 months of treatment, sputum culture conversion status was determined. Data was analyzed to assess the impact of second line drugs resistance on culture conversion.

RESULTS

DST of total 100 RR-TB patients showed a high resistance to fluoroquinolone (FQs; levofloxacin-56%; moxifloxacin-44%) followed by kanamycin (8%) and capreomycin (6%). None of them were resistant to other drugs (amikacin, clofazimine and linezolid) tested. At 6 months of treatment follow-up, 28 patients were lost to follow-up and 8 died. Microbiological outcome could be obtained from the remaining 64 patients. Successful culture conversion was achieved in only 62.5% of patients. FQ-resistance was found to be a strong predictor (p < 0.001) for unfavorable microbiological outcome.

CONCLUSION

The rate of FQ-resistance among RR/MDR-TB is high and it has strong association with un-successful…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 64 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free