Evidence Hub

Mixed infection of three nontuberculous mycobacteria species identified by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in a patient with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis: a rare case report and literature review

Chen X, Zhu J, Liu Z, Ye J, Yang L, Zhang Z

BMC nephrology, 2023

12 citations

Abstract

Background: Peritonitis caused by nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is an infrequent but important complication in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). There has been no report of mixed infections with multiple NTM. Peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP) caused by Mycobacterium abscessus is more common than that caused by M. smegmatis and M. goodii.

Case presentation: This case concerns a patient with PDAP caused by gram-positive bacilli, which could not be identified at the species level in successive detections of initial peritoneal effluent. Later, M. smegmatis was detected with no sensitivity results in bacterial culture. However, metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and first whole-genome sequences indicated that there were three species coexisting in the culture, including M. smegmatis (24,708 reads), M. abscessus (9224 reads), and M. goodii (8305 reads). This is the first case of PDAP with specific evidence that conventional detection methods isolated a poorly pathogenic NTM, whereas mNGS and first whole-genome sequences identified multiple NTM. Pathogenic bacteria might not be detected using conventional methods due to their lower abundance. This case report is the first description of mixed infections with more than two species of NTM during PDAP.

Conclusions: PDAP caused by multiple NTM is rare, and the diagnosis is difficult. When NTM are isolated by conventional tests in patients who are suspected of infection, clinicians should be…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free