Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of Semaglutide on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Zaryab Bacha, J. Javed, Maheen Sheraz, Munazza Sikandar, Mishal Zakir, M. Ali, Mamur Khan, Asad Iqbal et al.

Cardiology in Review, 2025

19,717 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Cardiovascular complications remain the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), despite substantial advances in pharmacologic management. Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, has shown potential in reducing cardiovascular events through its multifaceted metabolic and anti-inflammatory effects. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of semaglutide in improving cardiovascular outcomes among patients with T2DM. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases up to March 30, 2025. Randomized controlled trials comparing semaglutide with placebo in adults with T2DM were included. Five randomized controlled trials with a total of 19,717 participants were included. Semaglutide was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events [risk ratios (RR), 0.82; P < 0.00001], cardiovascular death (RR, 0.81; P = 0.05), and need for coronary revascularization (RR, 0.74; P < 0.0001). A significant reduction in cardiac disorder-related adverse events was also observed (RR = 0.80; P = 0.03). No significant difference was noted in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.83; P = 0.16), hospitalization for heart failure (RR = 0.86; P = 0.10) or unstable angina (RR = 0.94; P = 0.63), nonfatal myocardial infarction (RR = 0.82; P = 0.10) or stroke (RR = 0.83; P = 0.06), and vascular disorders (RR = 1.03; P = 0.73). These findings highlight…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 19,717 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free