Evidence Hub

A digital therapeutic application (ePAL) to manage pain in patients with advanced cancer: A randomized controlled trial

M. Kamdar, K. Jethwani, A. Centi, S. Agboola, N. Fischer, L. Traeger, Simone P. Rinaldi, J. Strand et al.

Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2024

112 participants · 37 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patients with advanced cancer often experience immense cancer pain that negatively impacts their quality of life. Interventions to address cancer-related pain are limited.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized trial of a digital therapeutic app (ePAL) for patients with advanced cancer receiving care in a specialty palliative care clinic at a tertiary care hospital. Patients were randomized to ePAL or usual care. ePAL included 1) active pain monitoring; 2) artificial intelligence algorithm to triage patient symptoms; and 3) patient education to address barriers to pain management. Participants were instructed to use ePAL over 8 weeks. Patient-reported pain symptoms were assessed at baseline, week-4, and week-8 (primary endpoint) using the Brief Pain Inventory. Secondary outcomes include pain-related hospitalizations by week-8.

RESULTS

We enrolled 112 patients who were randomly assigned to ePAL (N=56) or usual care (N=56). Patients utilized ePAL on average 2.1 times per week to report pain symptoms, and 47.6% reported their pain at least once per week over eight weeks. Patients randomized to ePAL reported lower pain scores at week-4 (mean: 3.16 vs. 4.28, P=0.010) and week-8 (mean:2.99 vs. 4.05, P=0.017), compared to those receiving usual care. Participants randomized to ePAL were less likely to experience a pain-related hospitalization compared to those in the usual care group (7.1% vs. 23.2% P=0.018) CONCLUSIONS: ePAL was associated with lower patient-reported pain and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 112 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free