Evidence Hub

Endophthalmitis After Clear Corneal Cataract Surgery: Outcomes Over Two Decades

Yannuzzi NA, Si N, Relhan N, Kuriyan AE, Albini TA, Berrocal AM, Davis JL, Smiddy WE et al.

American journal of ophthalmology, 2017

63 participants

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features, causative organisms, and visual acuity (VA) outcomes associated with acute-onset endophthalmitis after clear corneal cataract surgery over the past 2 decades.

DESIGN: Retrospective case series.

METHODS: Clinical and microbiology records were reviewed for 63 eyes of 63 patients who presented to a tertiary referral center between 2006 and 2015 with culture-positive endophthalmitis occurring within 6 weeks of clear corneal cataract surgery.

RESULTS: The mean time between surgery and diagnosis of endophthalmitis was 8 days (median 6 days). The initial treatment included intravitreal vancomycin and ceftazidime in 59 of 63 (94%) eyes and intravitreal vancomycin and amikacin in 4 of 63 (6%) eyes. Intravitreal dexamethasone was used in 50 of 63 (79%) eyes. A vitreous tap and injection with antibiotics was performed as the initial treatment in 57 of 63 (90%) eyes and pars plana vitrectomy in 6 of 63 (10%) eyes. Coagulase-negative Staphylococcus was isolated in 39 of 63 (62%) eyes, Staphylococcus aureus in 7 of 63 (11%) eyes, and Streptococcus species in 7 of 63 (11%) eyes. A VA of ≥20/40 was achieved in 24 of 63 (38%) eyes. None of the gram-positive isolates were vancomycin resistant. Twenty-four of 49 isolates (49%) were sensitive to cephalothin, cefazolin, and cefuroxime. Sensitivity to fluoroquinolones included 22 of 52 (42%) to levofloxacin, 20 of 54 (37%) to ciprofloxacin, 16 of 47 (34%) to moxifloxacin, and 3 of 13 (23%) to…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case series, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health. Reported size: 63 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free