Evidence Hub

QT interval prolongation in patients receiving bedaquiline-based regimens for drug-resistant tuberculosis in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Morrish Obol Okello, Pitua I, James Nelson Okema, Doris Ekwem, Felix Bongomin, Ronald Olum

Journal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, 2026

126 participants

Abstract

Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is a significant public health challenge, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where 80% of affected individuals reside. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical presentation and outcomes of children with SCA hospitalized at GRRH. A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted, reviewing medical records of children aged 0–18 years hospitalized with SCA at Gulu Regional Referral Hospital (GRRH) between January 2019 and June 2024. Data on demographics, clinical presentations, interventions, and outcomes were collected and analyzed with descriptive statistics in Stata 18.0. Of 126 children enrolled, the median age was 7 years (IQR 3–10 years), with 55.6% male (n = 70). Painful crises (86.5%, n = 109) and fever (66.7%, n = 84) were the most common presentations, followed by jaundice (21.4%, n = 27) and respiratory distress (8.7%, n = 11). Most children (98.4%, n = 124) had hospital stays of less than one week, with 94.4% (n = 119) achieving complete recovery. Treatment included folic acid supplementation (99.2%, n = 125), antibiotics (96.8%, n = 122), and hydroxyurea (14.3%, n = 18). Mortality was 3.9% (n = 5), and 1.6% (n = 2) were transferred. Painful crises and fever were predominant clinical features, with high recovery rates and short hospital stays suggesting relatively favourable outcomes at GRRH. Mortality was 3.9%, which is lower than or comparable to reported inpatient mortality rates of 4–12% for paediatric sickle cell anaemia in other…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 126 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free