Evidence Hub

Cefaclor and amoxycillin in the treatment of infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Law MR, Holt HA, Reeves DS, Hodson ME

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 1983

27 participants

Abstract

The clinical effectiveness of cefaclor 500 mg three times daily in the treatment of acute infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis has been investigated by a double-blind comparison with amoxycillin in the same dose in 30 in-patients and 50 out-patients. The two antibiotics were equally effective, in terms of resolution of presenting symptoms, sputum conversion and fall in 24 h sputum weight. Side effects were infrequent. Serum and sputum concentrations of antibiotics and 24 h urinary recovery were measured in 27 patients. Concentration of both cefaclor and amoxycillin was found to be significantly lower in mucoid sputum than in purulent sputum, in contrast to earlier reports in the case of amoxycillin. No clinical advantage was apparent for patients achieving higher sputum concentration of either antibiotic.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 27 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free