Evidence Hub

Evaluation of antibiotic treatment initiation and duration practices in primary care. Cross-sectional study in two French multi-professional health centers

Ferme S, Piednoir E, Delestre M, Fiaux E, Masik J, Verdon R, Thibon P

PloS one, 2024

476 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance poses a significant human and economic burden. In France, which ranks among the highest consumers of antibiotics in Europe, 93% of prescriptions are issued in primary care, primarily for respiratory tract infections. It is crucial to limit both the indications and the duration of antibiotic prescriptions, with recently updated recommendations in France aimed at achieving this goal. Our main objective was to evaluate whether general practitioners' antibiotic initiation and prescription durations for respiratory infections align with these recommendations. In this prospective cross-sectional study conducted over six weeks in two multi-professional health centers, all consultations for respiratory infections (in both adults and children) documented in patients' medical records were reviewed. Overall, 46.8% (N = 334/714) of consultations resulted in an antibiotic prescription (15.8% for nasopharyngitis and 83.5% for acute cough and bronchitis). Compliance with recommended antibiotic durations was observed in 66.7% (N = 476/714) [95% CI: 63.1%-70.0%] of consultations, with adherence rates exceeding 80% for nasopharyngitis and pharyngitis but falling below 20% for community-acquired pneumonia and acute cough and bronchitis. In total, 1,194 excess days of antibiotic therapy were identified, with an average excess of 1.7 days per prescription [95% CI: 1.4-1.9]. There remains significant room for improvement in both reducing the initiation of antibiotic…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 476 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free