Evidence Hub

New Insights on the Pharmacokinetics of Ulifloxacin After Administration of Prulifloxacin in Patients with Mild, Moderate and Severe Renal Impairment

Tellone V, Coppola P, Ammendola M, Di Loreto G, Picollo R, Del Vecchio A, Comandini A, Garofolo F et al.

Drugs in R&D, 2018

600 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: The antibacterial agent prulifloxacin, a prodrug of ulifloxacin, is indicated in the treatment of acute lower urinary tract infections, acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis and acute bacterial rhinosinusitis.

Objective: We aimed to provide new insights on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of ulifloxacin in patients with different degrees of renal impairment.

Methods: A two-site, international, open-label, parallel-group, single- and repeated-dose study was performed. The drug was administered as a single dose of 600 mg to subjects with normal renal function and patients with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment. Subsequently, the same dose was administered daily for 7 days to subjects with normal renal function and patients with mild and moderate renal impairment, while a dose of 300 mg was administered daily for 7 days to patients with severe renal impairment. Plasma and urine ulifloxacin levels were measured. Complete safety evaluation was performed.

Results: Exposure to ulifloxacin increased as renal function decreased due to a lower ulifloxacin clearance. Ulifloxacin PK were significantly changed only in patients with severe renal impairment. The amount of ulifloxacin excreted in urine over a 24-h dosing period was similar in subjects with normal renal function and patients with mild impaired renal function, but lower in those with moderate and severe renal impairment.

Conclusion: Our data show that prulifloxacin is a safe quinolone and is well tolerated in…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 600 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free