Evidence Hub

Metformin use and prostate cancer risk: A meta-analysis of cohort studies

Zhao-Han Feng, Xiao-Feng Zhou, Nai-Bo Liu, Jianfeng Wang, Xing Chen, Xin Xu

Medicine, 2019

282 citations

Abstract

Background: The relationship between metformin use and the risk of prostate cancer is still inconclusive. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of all eligible cohort studies to evaluate a potential association of metformin use with prostate cancer risk. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science databases through July 2018. A DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model was applied to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Eighteen cohort or nested case-control studies were included in this study with a total of 52,328 cases. In a random-effect pooled analysis, metformin use was not significantly associated with the risk of prostate cancer (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.80–1.16, P = .711). Statistically significant heterogeneity was identified among included studies (P < .001, I2 = 98.1%). Sensitivity analysis indicated that no single study dominated the pooled RR. Conclusion: The present large meta-analysis of cohort studies did not find an association between metformin use and prostate cancer risk.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free