Evidence Hub

Infection in the elderly: studies with lomefloxacin

Crome P, Bruce-Jones P

The American journal of medicine, 1992

3 citations

Abstract

Results of trials of lomefloxacin (400 mg once daily) in elderly patients with uncomplicated urinary tract infections, complicated urinary tract infections, acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, and as prophylaxis for transurethral surgical procedures (400 mg single dose) have been analyzed. In patients greater than or equal to 65 years of age with uncomplicated urinary tract infections, the bacterial eradication rate for lomefloxacin was 100%. In patients with complicated urinary tract infections, the bacterial eradication rate for lomefloxacin (92.2%) was statistically superior to comparator agents (84.9%, p = 0.012). In elderly patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis caused predominantly by gram-negative pathogens, lomefloxacin eradicated 85.2% of pathogens versus 73.8% for amoxicillin (p = 0.004). Lomefloxacin was 98% effective as a prophylactic agent in transurethral surgery. The bacteriologic and clinical efficacy of lomefloxacin was similar in young and elderly groups of patients. Lomefloxacin appears to be as effective as the comparator drugs in both young and elderly patients.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free