Evidence Hub

Preventive treatment of chronic bronchitis: a meta-analysis of clinical trials with a bacterial extract (OM-85 BV) and a cost-effectiveness analysis

Bergemann R, Brandt A, Zoellner U, Donner CF

Monaldi archives for chest disease = Archivio Monaldi per le malattie del torace, 1994

Abstract

Chronic bronchitis is a lifelong disease with significant effects on the patient and on the costs to health insurance institutions. Acute exacerbations in chronic bronchitic patients may have a negative impact on patients' quality of life and on the progression of the disease, particularly in more severe patients. The clinical efficacy of the immunoactive bacterial extract OM-85 BV has been shown in several clinical trials, a cost-effectiveness evaluation (CEA) of its use in chronic bronchitic patients has not been fulfilled so far. In this study a meta-analysis on the preventive treatment of acute exacerbations with OM-85 BV and a CEA, focusing on direct costs only, was performed. The meta-analysis showed a mean value of 0.6 prevented acute exacerbations per 6 months per patient, and a reduction of 9 days in antibiotic treatment per 6 months per patient. CEA evaluated the different cost elements. The mean direct cost (consultations, antibiotics, etc.) for the treatment of 1 acute exacerbation in chronic bronchitic patients was calculated as 143, 459 Lira. Thus for 0.6 prevented acute exacerbations per 6 months per patient a reduction in cost of 86,075 Lira (0.6-143,459) could be expected. The additional costs for the preventive treatment with OM-85 BV, based on prices for Italy, are 34,980 Lira per patient per 6 months. In conclusion, the effective cost savings per patient per 6 months are 51, 095 Lira. The sensitivity analysis revealed only one critical parameter, i.e. the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free