Evidence Hub

Randomized comparative study of cefixime versus cephalexin in acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Verghese A, Roberson D, Kalbfleisch JH, Sarubbi F

Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 1990

86 participants

Abstract

Patients with purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were randomized to receive either a single 400-mg daily dose of cefixime or 250 mg of cephalexin, orally, four times a day. Patients were males with a mean age of 63 years. Of the 86 patients, 71 (82%) had bronchitis caused by a single organism (29 by Haemophilus influenzae, 27 by Branhamella catarrhalis, 9 by gram-negative enteric organisms, 6 by Streptococcus pneumoniae), while more than one pathogen was implicated in 15 patients (18%). A total of 70.8% of the cefixime group and 50% of the cephalexin group were clinically cured (chi 2 = 3.89, P less than 0.05); however, when the categories of cured and improved were combined, no significant difference was noted between treatment groups (chi 2 = 3.39, P = 0.06). Analysis of side effects included all 130 evaluable and nonevaluable patients: diarrhea was noted in six patients in the cefixime group and none of the patients in the cephalexin group (P = 0.013 by the Fisher exact test). The diarrhea was mild and self-limited in all cases. B. catarrhalis has emerged as a major cause of exacerbation of bronchitis in our experience; there is an increased need to emphasize the examination of sputum samples by Gram staining if cost-effective antibiotic choices are to be made; any empirically chosen antibiotic should have activity against beta-lactamase-producing strains of B. catarrhalis as well as S. pneumoniae and H. influenzae.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 86 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free