Evidence Hub

Dirithromycin concentrations in bronchial mucosa and secretions

Leroyer C, Muller-Serieys C, Quiot J, Benhamou D, Clavier J, Bergogne-Bérézin E

Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 1998

46 participants

Abstract

Since a high tissue penetration of dirithromycin (D) has been assessed in early studies, the aims of this study were to determine D concentrations in bronchial mucosa and secretions in patients suffering from an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB), to compare intra-individual bronchial mucosa and secretion concentrations and to relate bronchial concentrations of D and clinical efficacy. The main inclusion criteria were comprised of (1) AECB, defined by the presence of an increase in dyspnea, sputum production and change in sputum purulence, and (2) clinical indication of fiberoptic bronchoscopy allowing performance of bronchial biopsies. All patients were treated with a 500-mg once-daily D dose for 5 days. Patients were randomly divided into three groups, according to sampling times (24, 48 and 72 h after the last dose). Tissue concentration analyses were performed by one blinded microbiologist (microbiological agar diffusion assay). The results showed: (1) 37 out of the 46 patients (80.4%) had a favorable response to treatment at the time of fiberoptic bronchoscopy (14 cured, 23 improved); (2) bronchial mucosa concentrations were high in all groups, and (3) mean values at 24, 48 and 72 h after the last dose were respectively 6.51 +/- 1.44, 6. 61 +/- 2.7, 5.67 +/- 1.02 mg.kg-1; no statistical difference was observed between the groups. In bronchial secretions collected simultaneously, concentrations were lower, i.e. 1.26 +/- 0.3, 0.61 +/- 0.12, 0.84 +/- 0.12.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 46 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free