A comparison of pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and amoxycillin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis
Abstract
Courses of 7 days on either 200 mg pivmecillinam/250 mg pivampicillin given twice daily or 250 mg amoxycillin given three times daily were compared in 3783 general practice patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in a single-blind parallel group study. Patients on pivmecillinam/pivampicillin had significantly more 'excellent' responses, although there was no difference in overall response between treatments. Post-treatment sputum colour and consistency and peak expiratory flow rates were significantly better with pivmecillinam/pivampicillin. The incidence of side-effects was the same for both groups (approximately 10%), although significantly more patients reported lower gastro-intestinal problems with amoxycillin. Treatment was withdrawn due to side-effects in 47 (2.5%) patients on pivmecillinam/pivampicillin and 51 (2.7%) patients on amoxycillin. Amoxycillin is a standard therapy in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. In this study, however, it was shown that pivmecillinam/pivampicillin offers benefits over amoxycillin in these patients.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 3,783 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health
- Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019
- The incidence of collagen-associated adverse events in pediatric population with the use of fluoroquinolones: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan
- Research Communications of the 32nd ECVIM-CA Online Congress
- Singlet-Oxygen Therapy. Scientific And Methodological Materials
- Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.