Treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Multicenter, randomized comparative study of cefuroxime axetil versus ofloxacin
Abstract
128 Patients (45 female, 83 male) with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis were treated with either cefuroxime axetil 2 x 500 mg/d (n = 65) or ofloxacin 2 x 200 mg/d for 7-8 days in a randomized controlled multicenter trial. From the respective groups, the results of 61 and 59 patients could be evaluated. Positive sputum tests were available in 85 cases (56 monoinfections, 29 mixed infections) prior to treatment. According to final clinical assessment, cure was achieved with cefuroxime axetil in 75%, but only in 50% with ofloxacin. The clinical efficacy of cefuroxime axetil was judged by the physicians to be more reliable than ofloxacin. The difference is statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Therapy with ofloxacin had to be terminated in 2 cases due to side effects. Altogether 4 adverse events were documented with ofloxacin. Compared with ofloxacin, cefuroxime axetil showed better efficacy and low risk of side effects.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 128 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health
- Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019
- The incidence of collagen-associated adverse events in pediatric population with the use of fluoroquinolones: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan
- Research Communications of the 32nd ECVIM-CA Online Congress
- Singlet-Oxygen Therapy. Scientific And Methodological Materials
- Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.