Evidence Hub

Dirithromycin versus amoxiclav in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Van Royen P, Betz W, Heyrman J, Taziaux P, Van den Haute M, Poelman M

The Journal of international medical research, 1997

334 participants

Abstract

A total of 334 patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis were treated with either dirithromycin for 5 days (n = 169) or amoxiclav for 7-10 days (n = 165) in an open randomized trial. The efficacy and tolerability of the two drugs were compared. There was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the two treatment arms. Clinical success (cure or improvement) was obtained in 94.5% and 93.1% of patients treated with dirithromycin and amoxiclav, respectively. Adverse events (mostly gastrointestinal) occurred in both groups, but led to discontinuation of treatment (in only seven patients). We conclude that the two drugs are equally efficacious and safe.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 334 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free