Comparison of azithromycin and co-amoxiclav in the treatment of acute tracheobronchitis and acute infectious exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adults. Azithromycin Study Group
Abstract
Azithromycin, a broad-spectrum azalide, and co-amoxiclav were compared in a randomized, multicentre, open-label trial in 759 patients treated for acute tracheobronchitis (n = 620) or acute infectious exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (n = 139). Patients were randomized (2:1) to a 3-day regimen of two azithromycin 250 mg capsules once daily or a 5-10-day regimen of co-amoxiclav, one 625 mg tablet three times daily. Azithromycin produced a significantly higher cure rate (70.6% versus 61.1%) than co-amoxiclav (P = 0.011) and there were fewer failures (7.8% versus 13.6%) and relapses in the azithromycin-treated group, giving a higher overall response rate for azithromycin (89.7% versus 80.2%, P = 0.0003). With azithromycin, compliance was better than with co-amoxiclav and there was a significantly shorter time to improvement or cure. A higher incidence of adverse events, mostly gastrointestinal, was reported by patients taking co-amoxiclav (21.3% versus 14%, P = 0.0097), causing more patients in this group to discontinue therapy (7% versus 1.2%, P = 0.00004).
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 759 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health
- Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019
- The incidence of collagen-associated adverse events in pediatric population with the use of fluoroquinolones: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan
- Research Communications of the 32nd ECVIM-CA Online Congress
- Singlet-Oxygen Therapy. Scientific And Methodological Materials
- Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.