Evidence Hub

Esberitox N as supportive therapy when providing standard antibiotic treatment in subjects with a severe bacterial infection (acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis). A multicentric, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Hauke W, Köhler G, Henneicke-Von Zepelin HH, Freudenstein J

Chemotherapy, 2002

53 participants

Abstract

53 patients with planned antibiotic therapy for the treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis as an example of a severe bacterial infection requiring antibiotics were included in a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. The chronic bronchitis was staged by forced expiratory volume of the 1st second (FEV(1)) measured in the infection-free interval prior to the current episode and had to be between 35 and 75% for the predicted value. Patients were randomly assigned to receive newer macrolide antibiotics plus either Esberitox N or placebo. Antibiotic therapy was administered according to generally accepted guidelines and Esberitox N or placebo was given for 28 days. The baseline-adjusted means for FEV(1) (%) on day 10 were 68.7 points for the Esberitox N group and 59.2 points for the placebo group (p = 0.0303). For FEV(1) the difference between the two treatment groups was 267 ml (p = 0.0499). The time to half maximal improvement was 5.7 days in the Esberitox N group compared to 12.8 days in the placebo group. The treatment was well tolerated; no serious adverse events were documented. In conclusion, comedication of antibiotics with Esberitox N in subjects with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis seems to be of benefit for the patient. Apparently, therapy with Esberitox N leads to a faster recovery from this severe bacterial infection, possibly via preventing an impairment of the host's immune system which might otherwise occur as a…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 53 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free