Evidence Hub

Pharmacovigilance study of azithromycin tablets (500 mg) in the treatment of adult patients with respiratory tract infections

Alvarez MP, Simón M, Sánchez S, Apaloaza I, Prieto J

Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia, 2000

141 participants

Abstract

Our aim was to study a new form of azithromycin (500 mg tablets) in order to evaluate the tolerability and the influence of the ingestion of food on tolerability, the efficacy and treatment compliance in a large number of patients with respiratory tract infections. We carried out an open, non-comparative, multicenter, observational and prospective pharmacovigilance study of 3223 outpatients with respiratory tract infections randomly assigned to receive a daily dose of azithromycin for three months taken either during or outside meals. Patients were evaluated during an initial visit and two later ones in order to record the adverse events and establish the clinical efficacy. The diagnostics were as follows: pharyngotonsillitis (1200), acute otitis media (394), acute bronchitis (1134), exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (436), and community-acquired pneumonia (53). The overall therapeutic efficacy was satisfactory (cure or improvement) in 96% to 97% at the second visit and in 93% to 94% in the third (pharyngotonsillitis, 93%; acute otitis media, 91%; acute bronchitis, 94%; exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, 94%; and community-acquired pneumonia, 96%). A total of 170 adverse events were reported in 141 patients (4.4%); 12 were severe yet not related to the study medication. Eighty-eight patients showed adverse events presumed to be related to azithromycin; most were in the digestive tract. No differences in tolerability were observed in relation to food intake. Treatment…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 141 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free