Evidence Hub

Clinical and microbiological evaluation of pefloxacin in lower respiratory tract infections

Tatsis G, Tsoukalas G, Hatzinikolaou V, Boulbasakos G, Jordanoglou J

The Journal of international medical research, 1996

31 participants

Abstract

Patients with Gram-negative lower respiratory tract infections (acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (n = 23), pneumonia (n = 4), and bronchiectasis (n = 5) were treated with pefloxacin, 400 mg twice daily, given either intravenously or orally. Symptoms, signs and sputum volume and colour were monitored daily. Chest X-rays, sputum culture and Gram-stain examinations were carried out on days 1 and 5, and immediately after the end of the treatment. There was a clinical improvement, as indicated by the incidence of cough, dyspnoea and rales, and by sputum volume and colour in 31 patients (97%). Microbiological improvement, as indicated by the complete elimination of sputum pathogens and pus cells, was achieved in 28 of the patients (88%). In one patient, an adverse effect, renal failure, occurred. These results suggest that pefloxacin is both clinically and microbiologically effective for the treatment of Gram-negative lower respiratory tract infections.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 31 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free