Evidence Hub

Cefodizime once daily in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections

Piovano CF, Palombini BC, Dagrosa EE, Mendoza F, Facco EB

Arzneimittel-Forschung, 1997

58 participants

Abstract

Cefodizime (CAS 69739-16-8, HR 221) is a new third-generation cephalosporin with pharmacokinetic properties that make it suitable for once-daily administration in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Ninety-nine adult hospitalized patients (66 males, 33 females, median age 57.5 years) received a once-daily injection of 2 g cefodizime for LRTI. Median treatment duration was 8 days. Forty-two patients received cefodizime intravenously and 57 intramuscularly. Indications for treatment were as follows; primary lobar pneumonia (n = 36), bronchopneumonia (n = 14), secondary pneumonia (n = 3), aspiration pneumonia (n = 5), acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (n = 21), and of bronchiectasis (n = 9) and acute purulent bronchitis (n = 11). General condition was good in 29 patients and poor in 58; 12 patients were critically ill. The following pathogens were isolated at baseline (source: bronchial secretions, sputum or blood): S. pneumoniae (n = 47), Haemophilus spp. (n = 17), M. catarrhalis (n = 6), Streptococcus spp. (n = 9), Staphylococcus spp. (n = 5), Klebsiella spp. (n = 4), Pseudomonas spp. (n = 1), A. calcoaceticus (n = 1) and anaerobic organisms (n = 7). Fifty-nine patients were evaluable for bacteriological response and 82 for clinical response. Bacteriological outcome was satisfactory in 29/30 patients having LRTI with parenchymal involvement (97%) and in 29/29 patients without parenchymal involvement (100%). Clinical cure was achieved in 41/43…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 58 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free