Treatment of lower respiratory tract infections with amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in adults
Abstract
Patients with lower respiratory tract infections [pneumonia (n = 16), bronchiectasis (n = 5) and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (n = 44)] were treated daily with amoxycillin/clavulanic acid given either 1.2 g intravenously three times daily or 625 mg orally three times daily for 7-15 days. Symptoms, signs and sputum volume and colour were monitored daily. Chest X-ray, sputum culture and Gram-stain examinations were also carried out on days 1 and 5, and immediately after the end of the treatment. There was a clinical improvement, as indicated by the incidence of cough, dyspnoea and rales, and by sputum volume and colour in 90.8% of the patients. Microbiological improvement, as indicated by the complete elimination of sputum pathogens and pus cells, was achieved in the same proportion of patients (90.8%). In one patient, an adverse side-effect, diffuse exanthema, was noted. Amoxycillin/clavulanic acid possesses a high clinical and microbiological efficacy for lower respiratory tract infections.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 44 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Impact of antibiotics on the human microbiome and consequences for host health
- Antibiotics in the clinical pipeline in October 2019
- The incidence of collagen-associated adverse events in pediatric population with the use of fluoroquinolones: a nationwide cohort study in Taiwan
- Research Communications of the 32nd ECVIM-CA Online Congress
- Singlet-Oxygen Therapy. Scientific And Methodological Materials
- Artificial Intelligence in Pharmacovigilance
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.