Evidence Hub

Significance of the sulfonamide component for the clinical efficacy of trimethoprim-sulfonamide combinations

Burman LG

Scandinavian journal of infectious diseases, 1986

Abstract

The reasons for combining trimethoprim (TMP) with sulfonamides (SUL) are still mainly theoretical but are supported by results from experimental infections and treatment of specific pathogens in humans, such as Branhamella catarrhalis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Brucella, Nocardia asteroides and perhaps Bordetella pertussis and Chlamydia trachomatis. Addition of SUL to TMP confers a therapeutic advantage also in patients with complicated urinary tract infection but probably not in young women with acute cystitis. Conditions that may enable TMP-SUL synergy in vivo can be expected to occur only in occasional cases of infection due to staphylococci, streptococci, Haemophilus or enteric bacteria. This fact together with ethical problems and availability of alternative therapies make further evaluations of the clinical significance of the SUL component of TMP-SUL very difficult. Although the use of TMP alone has shown promise in exacerbations of chronic bronchitis the role of the SUL component in TMP-SUL treatment of infections outside the urinary tract remains to be defined in comparative clinical trials.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free