Evidence Hub

Double-blind study of OM-85 in patients with chronic bronchitis or mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Solèr M, Mütterlein R, Cozma G, Swiss-German OM-85 Study Group

Respiration; international review of thoracic diseases, 2007

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interventions against acute exacerbations (AEs) of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are increasingly called for to reduce morbidity, mortality and costs. OM-85, a detoxified immunoactive bacterial extract, has been shown to prevent recurrent exacerbations of bronchitis and COPD.

OBJECTIVES: It was the aim of this study to demonstrate the protective effect of OM-85 against recurrent bronchitic exacerbations in patients with chronic bronchitis or mild COPD. The primary end point was the mean rate of AEs occurring within the study period.

METHODS: This double-blind multi-centre study enrolled adult outpatients>40 years old of both sexes with a history of chronic bronchitis or mild COPD at the time of an AE. The treatment consisted of one capsule of OM-85 or placebo per day for 30 days, followed by three 10-day courses for months 3, 4 and 5, with a 6-month study duration and monthly control visits.

RESULTS: One hundred and forty-two patients were treated with OM-85 and 131 received placebo. By the end of the treatment period, the mean number of AEs in the OM-85 group was 0.61 per patient versus 0.86 per patient in the placebo group (-29%; p=0.03). The difference between treatments was most notable in patients with a history of current or past smoking (-40%; p<0.01). No serious adverse events were attributed to the medication and no significant laboratory changes were reported.

CONCLUSIONS: OM-85 significantly reduced the frequency of AEs in patients with…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free