Evidence Hub

Cefaclor in the treatment of infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in cigarette smokers

Cazzola M, Franco C, Gioia V, Legnani D, Mancini V, Polverino M, Sevieri G

Journal of chemotherapy (Florence, Italy), 1991

106 participants

Abstract

There is a direct correlation between number of cigarettes smoked and the incidence of lower respiratory tract infection in humans. In studies with smokers suffering from exacerbations of chronic bronchitis, the most common bacterial pathogens found were Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus and Branhamella catarrhalis. Antibiotics should be effective against such possible pathogens. Cefaclor has demonstrated in vitro activity against all these pathogens. We designed the present study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefaclor in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in cigarette smokers. A total of 106 patients were enrolled in the study. H. influenzae was the most common bacterial species isolated in the sputum (in 23.6% of the total sample), followed by S. pneumoniae (18.9%), S. aureus (17.0%), K. pneumoniae (7.5%) and B. catarrhalis (5.7%), while mixed forms were present in 22.6% of cases and other pathogens in 4.7%. Cefaclor (500 mg) was given orally every 8h for 7 to 16 days (mean 10.73 +/- 2.11). Analysis of clinical response data indicates that 75.5% of patients were cured and 17.0% improved. This finding is important because it demonstrates that cefaclor's spectrum of activity encompasses all the most likely pathogens encountered in smokers. Because of its excellent response rate, cefaclor is of particular value in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections in cigarette smokers.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 106 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free