Evidence Hub

Community-acquired respiratory tract infections caused by resistant pneumococci: clinical and bacteriological efficacy of the ketolide telithromycin

Fogarty CM, Kohno S, Buchanan P, Aubier M, Baz M

The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2003

3,935 participants

Abstract

The incidence of community-acquired respiratory tract infections caused by Streptococcus pneumoniae exhibiting antibacterial resistance has increased dramatically in recent years. Telithromycin is the first of a new class of antibacterials, the ketolides, which have been developed specifically to provide effective treatment for these infections. Data were analysed from 3935 patients who had participated in one Japanese Phase II study and 11 US/global Phase III studies in three indications: community-acquired pneumonia, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis or acute sinusitis. Patients received either telithromycin 800 mg once daily or a comparator antibacterial. S. pneumoniae isolates considered to be causative for infection were tested for susceptibility to penicillin G and erythromycin A. In per-protocol analyses, telithromycin showed a high level of clinical efficacy against S. pneumoniae, with clinical cure rates of 92.8% for all isolates, 91.7% for those with reduced susceptibility to penicillin G and 86.0% for those with reduced susceptibility to erythromycin A. Bacterial eradication rates were consistent with the clinical outcomes. High rates of clinical cure and bacterial eradication were also observed for infections caused by isolates demonstrating high-level resistance to erythro-mycin A [MICs >/= 512 mg/L: 100% (13/13) clinical cure, 100% (13/13) bacterial eradication]. These results support the use of telithromycin as a first-line oral therapy for the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,935 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free