Evidence Hub

A pooled analysis of telithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections in adults

Carbon C

Infection, 2003

4,743 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Thirteen multinational, Phase III studies were conducted to establish the efficacy of telithromycin 800 mg once daily in the treatment of community-acquired respiratory tract infections (RTIs).

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were analyzed from 4,743 adult patients participating across four indications: community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) of mild to moderate severity, acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB), acute maxillary sinusitis (AMS) and tonsillitis/pharyngitis.

RESULTS: Treatment with telithromycin for either 5 days (AECB, AMS and tonsillitis/pharyngitis) or 7-10 days (CAP and AMS) provided high rates of clinical and bacteriologic cure (5-day, 87.0% and 86.0%, respectively; 7 to 10-days, 90.3% and 90.5%, respectively) that were equivalent to those of a 10-day course of comparator antibacterials (86.5% and 86.5%, respectively). The clinical efficacy of telithromycin extended to high-risk CAP and AECB patients and to all key respiratory pathogens, including Streptococcus pneumoniae strains resistant to penicillin or erythromycin and atypical/intracellular pathogens. Telithromycin was generally well-tolerated across patient groups.

CONCLUSION: These findings support the use of telithromycin as an effective therapy for the treatment of community-acquired RTIs.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a secondary / pooled analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 4,743 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free