Evidence Hub

Acute infective exacerbations of chronic bronchitis

Ball P, Harris JM, Lowson D, Tillotson G, Wilson R

QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians, 1995

471 participants

Abstract

Patients with an acute infective exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) (n = 471) were enrolled into a computer-based general-practice study to determine whether features of past history, presenting symptoms, or findings on examination were predictive of failure to recover. The median age was 68, 56.3% were male, and 82% were current or ex-smokers. All had daily sputum production and 57.5% had moderate or severe airflow obstruction. During the AECB 11.5% were pyrexial, and 80.7% had abnormal auscultatory findings; about half had moderate to severe increases in dyspnoea and airflow obstruction, and the majority had increases in sputum volume and/or purulence. The median number of AECBs in the previous year was three, and one-third of patients had cardiopulmonary disease. The only factors significantly (p < 0.05) predicting failure to recover from an AECB were historical. Neither clinical features at presentation nor antibiotic treatment affected recovery. Coexistent cardiopulmonary disease was a risk factor for returning with a chest problem and for being referred to hospital. The number of chest infections in the previous 12 months was a risk factor for returning with a chest problem. The higher the number of chest infections, the higher the odds of returning with a chest problem. The best combination predicting return with a chest problem was history of cardiopulmonary disease and more than four previous AECBs in the last 12 months. The sensitivity was 75% and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 471 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free