Evidence Hub

Prognostic impact of plasma lipids in patients with lower respiratory tract infections - an observational study

Gruber M, Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Keller U, Müller C, Bingisser R, Tamm M, Mueller B et al.

Swiss medical weekly, 2009

572 participants

Abstract

PRINCIPLES: A decrease in plasma lipids occurs during severe sepsis and has prognostic implications in critical illness. Whether lipids have prognostic implications or could help to differentiate community-acquired pneumonia from other lower respiratory tract infections remains unknown.

METHODS: We analysed data from patients with lower respiratory tract infections enrolled in four prospective trials. We studied the time courses of total cholesterol (TC), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) and triglycerides (TG) and compared them with the underlying diagnosis and medical outcomes.

RESULTS: Of 572 patients included, 372 had community-acquired pneumonia and 200 acute and exacerbations of chronic obstructive bronchitis. We found significantly lower concentrations of TC, LDL-C and HDL-C in all patients on admission as compared to hospital discharge, particularly in community-acquired pneumonia. A multivariate logistic regression analysis including HDL-C, CRP, age and diabetes showed that HDL-C (OR: 0.18 [95%CI 0.11-0.3]) and CRP (OR: 1.01 [95%CI 1.01-1.02]) were independent predictors of community-acquired pneumonia. TC levels were significantly lower in non-survivors than in survivors (3.26 mmol/L [95%CI 2.58-3.96] vs 3.78 mmol/L [95%CI 3.01-4.65]). The prognostic accuracy, defined as the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve of TC to predict mortality, was 0.63 (95%CI 0.53-0.72) in all patients and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 572 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free