Evidence Hub

The clinical evaluation of piperacillin and sulbactam sodium in treatment of respiratory, urinary tracts and other infections in 579 patients

Zhou J, Zhao Y, Guo W, Cao QM, Zhao SM, Li GP, Ma XJ

Zhonghua nei ke za zhi, 2011

500 participants

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of piperacillin and sulbactam sodium combinations in the treatment of common infections.

METHODS: This was a multi-centre, prospective and open study. All subjects from 57 wards caught common infection like respiratory (RTI) or urinary diseases (UTI). The dosages of piperacillin and sulbactam sodium combinations 2.5 g injection were determined according to indications: for adult, 2.5 g or 5 g per time, 2 time/day; for severe or obstinate infection, 2.5 g or 5 g per time, 3 time/day. General information, clinical response pre- and post-treatment, infected locus, drug recipe and protocol, prognosis and adverse reaction were recorded.

RESULTS: Data of 579 cases were collected with 388 males and 191 females. The average age was (66.8 ± 17.0) years. There were 500 patients who were suffering with RTI, with 362 cases of pneumonia, 102 of acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis, and 36 of other infections. There were 50 cases with UTI, with 31 of simple urinary tract infection, and 19 of complex urinary tract infection. In addition, there were 9 cases of combined RTI and UTI, and 20 of other infections including peritonitis. The average duration of anti-microbial for RTI and UTI was (8.65 ± 3.78) days and (7.45 ± 3.46) days respectively with the total efficacy rate was 92.6% and 98.0% respectively for RTI and UTI. The incidence of adverse events was only 0.86% (5 cases), including nausea, rash, itching, ALT elevation and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 500 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free