Evidence Hub

A systematic review on how primary care electronic medical record data have been used for antimicrobial stewardship

Ron Cheah, Caroline Chen, Daniel Capurro N, Jo-Anne Elizabeth Manski-Nankervis, Vlada S. Rozova, Karin Thursky

Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Objective: This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence from current literature to describe how Electronic Medical Record (EMR) primary care data have been used for antimicrobial stewardship activities internationally. Design: Systematic literature review. Methods: We searched Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science from January 1, 2013 to September 23, 2023 to retrieve studies that included concepts of "antimicrobial stewardship," "primary care," and "electronic medical records." We used narrative synthesis to classify and interpret results. Data were grouped and tabulated by similar themes and concepts, including strengths, facilitators, barriers, and limitations for antimicrobial stewardship. Results: A total of 265 articles were identified from the initial search, of which 34 full-text articles from 10 countries met all criteria and were included in the review. Six categories of EMR data use were identified from the studies, these were for: assessing antimicrobial prescribing quality, measuring the effectiveness of an intervention, analyzing antimicrobial prescribing trends, assessing patient and provider characteristics in prescribing, evaluating novel tools or measures, and measuring specific conditions and outcomes. Facilitators of use of EMR data were generally well-described across the studies reviewed; however, barriers were not. Barriers described were centered around EMR system design and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free