Evidence Hub

Comparison of the Efficacy on Glycaemic Control and Safety Profile of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 and Biphasic Human Insulin 30 Both in Combination With Metformin in Insulin-naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled on Oral Antidiabetic Drugs (OADs) Therapy

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2009

145 participants

Abstract

This trial is conducted in Asia. The aim of this clinical trial is to investigate the blood sugar lowering effect and the safety profile of biphasic insulin aspart 30 compared to biphasic human insulin 30, both in combination with metformin in Chinese insulin-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes when failing on oral antidiabetic drug (OAD) therapy.

Conditions: Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.

Primary outcome: Change in IAUC (Incremental Area Under the Curve) for Postprandial Glucose (0-4 Hours) Over 3 Main Meals.

Enrollment: 145 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 145 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free