Evidence Hub

A 56-week, Multicenter, Open-label, Active-controlled, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Efpeglenatide Once Weekly Compared to Dulaglutide Once Weekly in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Metformin

ClinicalTrials.gov · TERMINATED, 2020

908 participants

Abstract

Primary Objective:

To demonstrate the non-inferiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide in comparison to once weekly injection of dulaglutide on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change in participants with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) inadequately controlled with metformin.

Secondary Objectives:

* To demonstrate the superiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide with once weekly injection of dulaglutide on glycemic control.

* To demonstrate the superiority of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide with once weekly injection of dulaglutide on body weight.

* To evaluate the safety of once weekly injection of efpeglenatide and once weekly injection of dulaglutide.

Conditions: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Primary outcome: Change From Baseline to Week 56 in HbA1c.

Enrollment: 908 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 908 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free