A Multi-national, Open-labelled, Randomised, Parallel Group, 4 Week run-in and 26 Weeks Treat-to-target Comparison of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Once Daily Versus Insulin Glargine Once Daily Both in Combination With Metformin and Glimepiride in Insulin naïve Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Abstract
This trial is conducted in Africa, Asia, Europe, Oceania and South America.
This trial aims for a comparison of biphasic insulin aspart 30 once daily versus insulin glargine once daily all in combination with metformin and glimepiride in insulin naive subjects with type 2 diabetes.
Conditions: Diabetes, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2.
Primary outcome: Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c).
Enrollment: 480 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 480 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Metformin as an adjuvant in breast cancer treatment
- Metformin Lysosomal Targeting: A Novel Aspect to Be Investigated for Metformin Repurposing in Neurodegenerative Diseases?
- Aberrant HSF1 signaling activation underlies metformin amelioration of myocardial infarction in mice
- Metformin induces ZFP36 by mTORC1 inhibition in cervical cancer-derived cell lines
- Protein Interaction Network for Identifying Vascular Response of Metformin (Oral Antidiabetic)
- Preventing Long COVID With Metformin
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.